Issues : Long accents
b. 18
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE inaccuracies |
||||||||
b. 105-117
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
We give the long accents in bars 105, 107 and 117 after Atut. In the editions, they were reproduced as short ones, whereas in GE, the mark in bar 105 was overlooked. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in FE , Errors in GE |
||||||||
b. 130
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||||
b. 137-138
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The long accent in bar 137 is Chopin's well thought-out decision – visible traces of corrections (erasures) suggest that the composer initially wrote a mark leading to the chord in the next bar. The orchestral parts are also provided with an accent in bar 138 (violins and cellos) or indeed a (double-basses). category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Long accents , Corrections in A |
||||||||
b. 162-165
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The type of accents used in FE at the beginning of bars 162 and 165 is unclear – both marks are clearly shorter than the undoubtedly long accents on the 3rd beat of these bars; however, they are longer than the accents in, e.g. bars 175-176. We assume that local relationships are of a greater importance and we reproduce the accents as short ones. In GE1 (→GE2), the mark in bar 162 is shorter than the one in bar 165, yet it is still shorter than the accents in the second halves of the bars. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE |