data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
b. 207
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The missing slur must be considered Chopin's or the engraver's mistake – in the remaining analogous bars, there are slurs, although inaccurate. In the main text, we suggest a slur modelled after the slurs of the sources in bars 205 and 209. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||
b. 207
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE, a category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 208
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In this context, two identical octaves at the beginning of the bar, the slur of the sources is almost certainly inaccurate. It could have been the revisers or even Chopin himself that did not notice it due to the enharmonic change of B category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
|||||
b. 210
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
Changing the accent's font to vertical is a characteristic manner of the engravers of EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||
b. 211
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text, at the beginning of the bar, we add a cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals |