![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Inaccuracies in GE
b. 263-265
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text, we include the correction of the phrasing written by Chopin in FED, which we consider rather a proofreading of the erroneously interpreted slur of [A] than a change of the slurring's concept. At the same time, we interpret the fact of the slurs coinciding at the beginning of bar 264, which could also reproduce the notation of [A] inaccurately, as a continuous slur, like it was written in the first element of the progression (bars 239-240). Both in GE1 (→GE2) and GE3, the shorter slur over bar 263 seems to be an inaccuracy. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions; Corrections & alterations issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FED , Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||||||
b. 269-270
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
Interpretation of the mark of FE (→EE) is unclear. When interpreted literally, it is a short accent under a tied note, which does not make sense on the piano. According to us, the course of music suggests a long accent on the syncopated g category imprint: Interpretations within context; Editorial revisions issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||||
b. 287
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||||
b. 295
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
We consider the slur of FE (→EE) to be inaccurate (shortened), most probably due to the notation of the topmost semiquavers on the upper stave, which interfered with a longer slur. In the main text, we suggest a longer slur, modelled after the authentic slur in bars 296 and 312. The slur in GE, starting later, which could be a revision or a mere inaccuracy, may, however, correspond to the notation of [A], since in similar contexts, it is sometimes very difficult to interpret slurs in Chopin's autographs. Therefore, one can consider the slur of GE3, although formally non-authentic, to be an acceptable variant. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
||||||||||
b. 300-301
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In GE1 (→GE2), all grace notes are non-slashed in these bars, which is one of the indications of evident distraction of the engraver of GE1 in bars 299-302 (other mistakes include an overlooked quaver flag in bar 300, an erroneous last semiquaver in the L.H. in bar 300, Terzverschreibung errors in the chords in bars 300 and 302 as well as, most probably, three overlooked category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |