



Slurs
b. 434-435
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
Addition of staccato dots and shift of the beginning of the slur are arbitrary changes of GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 435
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The ending of the slur is unclear in the majority of the editions – the slur does not go beyond d category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 436
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text, we begin the slur from the 1st semiquaver, in accordance with the slurs FE contains in the majority of analogous bars. Staccato dots are an arbitrary addition of a revision of GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 436-437
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
We consider the missing slur in FE to be an oversight (of the engraver or Chopin). The slur suggested in the main text is modelled after authentic slurs in analogous bars 412-414. The range of the slur added in EE is unclear – when interpreted literally, it encompasses the last 9 semiquavers in bar 436; however, its shape and placement suggest that it was supposed to have the same range as the one given by us. The version of GE3 is arbitrary. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 437
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The staccato dots were arbitrarily added by the reviser of GE3, whereas the slur was repeated after the previous bar. In the main text, we keep the slur of FE (→EE,GE1→GE2), which we consider to be correct. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |