



Slurs
b. 304
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
According to us, the division of the slur reproduced in the sources is inaccurate, which is facilitated by such configuration. A possible interruption of legato would require shortening f category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
|||||||||
b. 305-306
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text, we suggest adding a slur on the 1st beat of bar 305 on the basis of a comparison with the next bar. A longer slur in bar 306 is most probably an inaccuracy of EE. The whole-bar slurs in GE3 are probably modelled after the slur in bar 289. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
|||||||||
b. 306-307
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text, we suggest adding a slur after analogous bars 290-291. The slur was added already in EE3 and GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
|||||||||
b. 307
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
Like in bar 291, in the main text we lower the slur, so that it points to the motif of the middle voice, f category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||||||
b. 307
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
Like in analogous bars 293-296, Chopin proofread the slurs in the L.H. in these bars, which is proved by the traces of corrections visible in FE. A two-bar slur replaced two slurs encompassing bar 307 and the last 2 beats of bar 308. category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Authentic corrections of FE |