b. 501
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The fact of assigning to the 3rd beat must be a result of misunderstanding the notation of [A] – see bar 16. The version of GE3 is a result of a complex, arbitrary revision modifying dynamics – here and in bar 15 and 19 – on the basis of dynamics of the orchestral part, written down in FEorch (→GEorch). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Centrally placed marks |
||||||
b. 502
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
is an arbitrary revision in GE3, as in analogous bar 17. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||
b. 505
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The missing must be considered a defect, since according to FEorch (→GEorch), the chords are performed by the entire orchestra in or dynamics. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||
b. 507
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text, we add cautionary naturals before the c-c1 octave. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||
b. 514
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text, we suggest adding a slur and dots after analogous bar 159. Missing performance indications could have been a result, unintended by Chopin, of a serious proofreading covering the beam and pitch of the 1st quaver (visible traces of changes in FE). category imprint: Editorial revisions; Corrections & alterations |