b. 444-446
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
After slurs in the two previous phrases, the missing slur in the L.H. must be considered an inaccuracy of notation (a similar situation occurs in bars 446-448). Both in GE1 (→GE2) and EE, the slur was added on the basis of the previous phrase; in turn, GE3 adopted a slur compliant with the source version of the slur in the R.H. (until the end of bar 445). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 445-446
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text, we suggest a slur to the beginning of bar 446 due to the consistent slurring of the analogous phrases in bars 416-424. A similar change was introduced already in EE (in a simplified, inaccurate manner, i.e. the ending of the slur was added in bar 446, which opens a new line, leaving the slur reaching the last semiquaver in bar 445 unchanged). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions |
||||||||
b. 446-447
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
EE overlooked the slur in the R.H., which must be a mistake. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
||||||||
b. 446-448
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
As in the case of the previous phrase, we consider the missing slur in the L.H. to be an inaccuracy of notation and add a slur modelled after the authentic slur in bars 442-444. A slur added in GE3 to the source slur in bars 440-442. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 446-447
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
category imprint: Differences between sources |