|
b. 409
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE, there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
|
b. 410
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text, we suggest adding a slur, also in bars 411 and 414-415, on the basis of the authentic slur in bars 434-435. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||||||||
|
b. 410
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE (→GE1→GE2), the last semiquaver is already embraced with the octave sign, used for the notation of the 1st beat of the next bar. The mistake was corrected in GE3 and formally also in EE, in which the entire octave sign was removed (overlooked?). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Errors repeated in GE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 410
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
An identical fingering of EE and FEH almost certainly corresponds to the Chopinesque one – cf. the Etude in A minor, op. 25 no. 11, bar 9, which Chopin provided with a fingering that should be used also in the next, similarly structured passages, in particular in bars 11-12. However, taking into account the repeatability of the four-note figures of the passage, it seems to be highly unlikely that Chopin would have indicated the fingering in such a detailed manner as it was written both in EE and FEH. In the main text, we give the most likely interpretation of the Chopinesque entry in FED – two ones, determining the key moments of the change of hand position. The latter was perhaps supposed to be, also or only, an erasure of the prematurely printed 8 of the octave sign. The resulting fingering most probably corresponds to the indications in EE and FEH. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Annotations in FEH |
|||||||||||
|
b. 410
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The fingering written in FEH, compliant with the authentic articulation of the L.H., could have been indicated by Chopin. There is a similar situation in bars 414 and 438. category imprint: Differences between sources |
raising d2 to d
2 in the sequence in the L.H. The mistake was corrected in 
