Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 107

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

..

In the sources, the sharps are placed also before f1 and f2

category imprint: Editorial revisions

issues: Cautionary accidentals , Last key signature sign

b. 110

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Minim d1 in Atut (literal reading→FEGE,EE)

Dotted minim d​1 in Atut, contextual interpretation

..

In Atut, the rhythmic value of the d1 minim is unclear – there is no stem next to it, hence it seems to be a semibreve. It can be a mere deficiency, frequent in Chopin's autographs; however, it cannot be excluded that Chopin planned here a dotted minim, like it is in the orchestra (bassoon I) and in similar bars 122 and 682.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Rhythmic errors , FE revisions , Inaccuracies in A

b. 110-111

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Slur in Atut, literal reading

Slur in Atut (possible interpretation→FEGE,EE)

..

When interpreted literally, the ending of the slur in Atut does not go beyond bar 110, which was considered an inaccuracy in FE (→GE,EE). In the main text, we include the literal interpretation, since the beginning of bar 111 is the overlap between two phrases, whereas the momentum with which the new phrase enters undoubtedly overshadows the delicate ending of the previous one.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Inaccurate slurs in A

b. 111-114

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Slur in Atut (→FE)

Slurs in GE & EE

Slurs suggested by the editors

..

In Atut (→FE), the slurring of the bass motifs is less accurate here than for the first time (bars 99-102) – the slur encompasses only the quavers in bar 111. According to us, it was caused by the fact that bar 111 is the last one on a page of Atut – while finishing that page, Chopin entered a slur under the part of motif he saw and, due to haste, forgot about the slurs on the next page. It also seems that the slur encompassing the first 3 quavers was the original idea – the shape of the slur in bars 99-100, written first, suggests that Chopin decided to lead it further, to the crotchet, only at the moment of writing it. Taking that into account, in the main text, in bars 111-114, we suggest such slurs as in analogous bars 99-102. In GE and EE, the shorter slur in bar 111 was kept and a similar one was added in bar 113.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions , GE revisions

b. 111

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Wedge in Atut, contextual interpretation

Dot in FE (→EE)

No mark in GE

..

In Atut, the first third in this bar is provided with two staccato marks – a dot under the notes and a wedge over them. Chopin perhaps put the second mark sometime after the first one, which he did not notice when reviewing the manuscript. However, it is uncertain which of the marks was "first." In the main text, we decided to put the wedge, more frequently used by Chopin in that period of his life in similar situations. In FE (→EE), there is a dot, which was probably overlooked in GE.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , Wedges