b. 91-92
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In Atut, the repeated quavers in the L.H. are written in both bars in an abbreviated manner as minims with tremolos. The same applies to the bottom voice in the R.H. in bar 91. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Abbreviated notation of A |
||||||
b. 91
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In Atut, a is written only next to the minim in the top voice. This patent inaccuracy was corrected already in FE (→GE,EE). The cautionary before c2 in this chord, present in all sources, is also noteworthy; it is unjustified in this context (omitted in the main text). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Accidentals in different octaves , Cautionary accidentals , FE revisions , Inaccuracies in A |
||||||
b. 92
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In GE1 (→GE2), the accent over d3 took the form of a short mark (long accent?), starting already over c3. In GE3, the inaccurate mark was omitted, although a respective mark in an analogous figure 4 bars later allowed for an easy reconstruction of the correct notation. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
||||||
b. 92
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The pronounced wedge written in Atut (→FE→EE) was reproduced in GE as a dot, which is a typical revision (inaccuracy?) of these editions. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Wedges |
||||||
b. 92
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text, we add a cautionary before g2. category imprint: Editorial revisions |