b. 4
|
composition: Op. 27 No 2, Nocturne in D♭ major
..
In EE, a long accent was added under b flat2, probably on the basis of the sign visible in FE in analogous bar 28. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||
b. 4-5
|
composition: Op. 27 No 2, Nocturne in D♭ major
..
The extent of the slur is not precisely marked in A. In GE (→FE→EE) the slur was read as ending in bar 4. In our opinion, it is more probable that Chopin intended it to reach the beginning of bar 5 (cf. the remark at the end of bar 2). category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccurate slurs in A |
|||||
b. 5
|
composition: Op. 27 No 2, Nocturne in D♭ major
..
The accent over a1 is doubtless a long one in A; this is testified by the change made in GE2 (probably after a repeated analysis of A). The sign in FE is not quite clear, yet it resembles a long accent more than a short one. In spite of that, EE has a short accent over the note in question. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE |
|||||
b. 5
|
composition: Op. 27 No 2, Nocturne in D♭ major
category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Errors of A , Accompaniment changes , Authentic corrections of GE |
|||||
b. 6-7
|
composition: Op. 27 No 2, Nocturne in D♭ major
..
In the sources, bar 7 begins a new line of text; in such situations it is difficult to decide in Chopin's autographs whether the slur is to be treated as a new sign or a continuation of the previous one. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccurate slurs in A |