data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
GE1
compare
If one takes into consideration that the slur opens a new page in the first editions, the added slurring in the left hand in EE could be viewed as an understandable editorial revision.The problem is, however, that this added full-bar slur contradicts Chopin's slurring written in bar 1 as a pattern to be followed for all the similar figures of the accompaniment.
Compare the passage in the sources »
See b. 2-6
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: EE revisions
notation: Slurs