mUltimate Chopin

Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 169

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Fingering written into FEJ

No teaching fingering
..

We give the Chopinesque fingering written in pencil to FEJ.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FEJ

b. 169

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

..

We add cautionary naturals before d2 and d in the main text.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

b. 170

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Fingering written into FEJ

No teaching fingering
..

We give the Chopinesque fingering written in pencil to FEJ.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FEJ

b. 172-173

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Fingering written into FEJ

No teaching fingering
..

We give the Chopinesque fingering written in pencil to FEJ.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FEJ

b. 172

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

..

In the main text, we add naturals before the 1st and 3rd semiquavers of the 2nd half of the bar (a2 and e3). The absence of accidentals in such a configuration was not considered a mistake back in Chopin's times – the accidentals from the 1st half of the bar, although they refer to a1 and e2, were considered to be valid also in the case of a2 and e3 in the further part of the bar, encompassed with an octave sign.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Editorial revisions

issues: Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE