mUltimate Chopin

Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 182

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

..

We add a cautionary ​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ before F in the main text.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

b. 184-186

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Dashes in FE (→EE)

No marks in FE
..

In GE, there are no dashes marking the range of crescendo, like in most of similar situations.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions

b. 184

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

..

We add a cautionary ​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ before d in the main text.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

b. 185

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

B​​​​​​​ in FE (→EE1→EE2)

B in GE & EE3

B with ​​​​​​​ suggested by the editors
..

In GE, a  raising B to B​​​​​​​ was added, most probably arbitrarily, before the bottom note of the 2nd crotchet. The reviser of EE3 also added that mark, probably under the influence of GE. However, we believe that the  is not authentic, since avoiding a strict repetition of a progression's segments is characteristic of Chopin, cf. e.g. a nearly identical harmonic sequence in the Rondo in F Major, Op. 5, bars 438-440. In order to avoid misunderstandings, we add a cautionary  in this place. 

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , GE revisions

b. 185-186

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

3 accents in FE (→EE)

No marks in GE
..

In GE, three accents are missing in the R.H. undoubtedly because of the engraver's oversight.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE