Issues : Errors in EE
b. 63
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Errors in GE |
||||||||
b. 72
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
The second slur of EE is an example of a quite frequent revision of that edition, which willingly added slurs, sometimes by analogy with authentic ones, sometimes totally arbitrarily. Similar additions – cf. e.g. the ending of the Nocturne in D Major, Op. 27 No. 2 or the Concerto in F Minor, Op. 21, 3rd mov., bars 325-334. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
||||||||
b. 99
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
c2 as the last semiquaver in FE (→GE1,EE) is most probably a mistake – cf. analogous bar 251. It is confirmed by the Chopinesque correction performed in pencil in FEJ. In turn, the reviser of GE2 removed the harmonic inconsistency with the L.H. part, yet he did not take into account the melodic structure of the figuration. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Errors in GE , Terzverschreibung error , Annotations in FEJ |
||||||||
b. 108-110
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
The missing 3 staccato dots for the bass E in bars 108-110 in EE are probably an oversight of the engraver. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
||||||||
b. 133
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
In EE1, there is no ending of the slur on a new line. The mistake was corrected already by the reviser of EE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE |