Issues : GE revisions
|
b. 155
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
The demisemiquaver passage in FE (→GE1) is devoid of the accidentals present before the 1st chord (not counting the octave sign) – the naturals of a1 and a2 and the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies |
||||||||
|
b. 156
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
FE (→GE1) are lacking in the naturals before the a1 and a2 demisemiquavers. The latter was added in EE, whereas both – in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies |
||||||||
|
b. 156-157
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
It is difficult to assume that Chopin could have imagined a different articulation for this pair of the L.H. octaves. It was already obvious to the revisers of both GE and EE. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 157
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
The only cautionary accidental in FE (→GE1→GE2) is the category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals |
||||||||
|
b. 169
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
The category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
of f
2. A comparison with the notation of the two previous bars, in which the 
of e2 is present in the passage, shows that possible rules of validity of accidentals were approached in a very flexible manner in such situations. In the remaining editions the notation was partially completed – 
before a
3. 
on 2nd beat in 