Issues : EE revisions
|
b. 50
|
composition: Op. 22, Andante spianato
..
FE feature accellerando (with doubled 'l') in this place. The mistake, certainly coming from Chopin (cf., e.g. the Impromptu in A category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Errors repeated in FE |
||||||||
|
b. 52
|
composition: Op. 22, Andante spianato
..
Arbitrary changes of horizontal accents to vertical ones belong to characteristic, frequent revisions of EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 52
|
composition: Op. 22, Andante spianato
..
In the main text we add a cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 53
|
composition: Op. 22, Andante spianato
..
The missing Chopinesque fingering in EE may indicate that it was added in the last phase of proofreading of FE. The digits were added in EE2 most probably on the basis of the finished FE or GE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
|
b. 55-62
|
composition: Op. 22, Andante spianato
..
The accents in b. 55-56 and 59-62 are undoubtedly short in FE, such as in b. 52. In spite of that, GE1 gives here bigger accents, such as in the preceding cantilena section, which is probably inadvertence (the second German edition introduced short accents, like in entire Andante). The introduction of vertical accents is a frequent discretion of EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
Major, Op. 29, 
before b3. The accidental was also added in 
before f
2 in the 2nd half of the bar.
