Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
|
b. 157
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The staccato dots over or under the a category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 162-166
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
No staccato dots over the first quavers in bars 162 and 166 is certainly an oversight of the engraver of GE1 (→FE→EE). The mistake was partially corrected in GE2, by adding a dot in bar 162 (also in the L.H.). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 199-201
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The missing staccato dots at the beginning of bar 197 (in both hands) and 199 can be almost certainly attributed to the inaccuracy of the engraver of GE1 (→FE→EE). The signs were added in GE2 after A. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 200-201
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The staccato dots at the beginning of the bars, in A written between the notes, were ignored both by the engraver of GE1 (→FE→EE) and the reviser of GE2. The signs are very small, since Chopin apparently did not want them to be confused with note heads. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||||
|
b. 205
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The In A one can see a deletion of the long accent over the part of the R.H. in this place. Similarly, in bar 207. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE , Corrections in A , GE revisions |
1 quavers were overlooked in 
in