Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
b. 206
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The moment of beginning the hairpin in A intended by Chopin is unclear. The sign starts clearly before the bar line of bar 206, the first one on a new page, which suggests that it began still in the previous bar; however, it does not allow to determine the precise location of the beginning of the sign. GE1 (→FE→EE) considered it simply an inaccuracy, which could be right. GE2 adopted a solution similar to the one adopted to the main text – beginning of the sign after the last note in bar 205. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A |
||||||||
b. 207-208
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The change of the clearly long accents in A to short ones is certainly a result of an inaccuracy of GE (→FE→EE). The sign in bar 207 was initially written over the top stave in A, and then deleted and replaced with an accent between the parts of both hands. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE , Corrections in A |
||||||||
b. 213
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 214-216
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The signs under the chords in the L.H. in bars 214 and 216 in A are typical long accents. In GE (→FE→EE) the first of them was reproduced as a short accent, whereas the second one as a . In GE2 the latter was shortened – most probably after A – so it can be considered a long accent. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 218
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
According to us, it is unclear whether the bar is to be considered analogous to bars 214 and 216 or to 219 and 220. In the first case, the sign written in A under the chord in the L.H. is to be considered a long accent; we assume this interpretation, resulting from the structure of the phrases in the R.H., in the main text. In the second case, the sign would be a diminuendo (), which, both here and in the next bars, has a function of an accent. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents |