Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
|
b. 372
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
According to us, the course of the music suggests a possible change of the performance manner of these motifs only from the next bar. Therefore, in the main text we suggest adding an accent in the discussed place. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 385
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The clear wedge written in A was reproduced in GE as a dot. In FE the sign is copied so inaccurately that it cannot be considered a staccato dot; this explains its absence in EE. A possible removal of the dot in FE by Chopin, which could have left such a trace, should be excluded, according to us. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Inaccuracies in GE , Wedges |
||||||||
|
b. 385-387
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In GE2, staccato dots in the part of the L.H. were added at the beginning of bars 385 and 387 together with the slurs. See also bars 387-388. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 387
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The omission of the wedge must be an oversight of GE1 (→FE→EE). The staccato sign – in the form of a dot – was added in GE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , Wedges |
||||||||
|
b. 397-398
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
in 
