Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
b. 340-341
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The missing accent in GE1 (→FE→EE) is almost certainly a mistake – the engraver most probably interpreted this sign as a tie of f1. An accent (short) was added in GE2, yet the tie was not omitted. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 342-344
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
We suggest adding staccato signs in a similar context in bars 342 and 344 after the dots in the L.H. in bar 348 written in A. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||||
b. 352
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
A more accurate specification of the unexpected B7 chord in the solo part already at the beginning of the bar must be a Chopinesque improvement introduced in the proofreading of FE (→EE). It is already a second change in this bar with respect to the earliest preserved version, after the rhythmic diversification – see the adjacent note. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
b. 352
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
Chopin's intention concerning the placement of the accent is uncertain. The change of its position in GE (→FE→EE) is almost certainly of a random nature, since in the version of A (→GE), in which there is a sole a2 at the beginning of the bar, it does not influence the meaning of this sign. After adding the d2 note in FE (→EE), the position of the accent may suggest accenting the bottom or top note of the d2-a2 fifth. In the main text we give an accent in the place where Chopin saw it while proofreading FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||||
b. 354
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
Shortened accents are a very frequent inaccuracy of GE, whereas the omission of the sign in FE is a patent mistake, revised then in EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Inaccuracies in GE |