|
b. 89
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
|
b. 90-92
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In FE, the accent in bar 90 was overlooked, which is undoubtedly a mistake. The sign was added in EE, probably by analogy with identical bar 92. Same as in all subsequent, similar bars, EE has short accents (cf. notes in bars 98-103, 106-108 and 114-116). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Errors in FE |
||||||||
|
b. 91-92
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In bar 91, the last one in the line of the text, the slur in GE1 suggests continuation, yet it can be considered to be inaccurately drawn, particularly since the slur in bar 92 starts from the 1st note. As a result, FE (→EE) has a clearly separate slur in each of these bars. GE2 reproduced the two-bar slur of A accurately. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||||
|
b. 92
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
FE overlooked the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE |
||||||||
|
b. 95
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
It is interesting that Chopin gave the 5th finger (cf. bar 109) in the ascending passage with an identical interval structure and a similar arrangement of white and black keys. It seems that he considered the second fingering to be more universal in this kind of positions – in the 2nd mov., in bar 31 the fingering 1-5 is copied on the same notes (g2-f2), although in this case there is no choice, since one has to play 5 notes in one position. category imprint: Differences between sources |
lowering g to g
. The patent mistake was corrected in 
