b. 102
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
An earlier beginning of the slur in FE (→EE) is certainly a mistake, similarly as in the case of the slur of GE1 (→FE→EE) in bars 98-99. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
|||||
b. 102
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE |
|||||
b. 103
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE |
|||||
b. 105
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||
b. 105
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
It is uncertain which type of accent Chopin considered here – the sign is significantly shorter than the next accent and a few others, but the difference to those in bars 99 and 102 is very small. Taking into account the syncopated nature of this minim and the fact that all surrounding long accents concern minims or minim-long motifs, we deem it to be long. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in A |