Verbal indications
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »
b. 87
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
The indication written in FED refers to the R.H. and, as such, it is probably a teaching remark aiming at inducing the pupil to perform a more pronounced accent and a fuller sound of the chord. category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||||||
b. 89
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||||
b. 90
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
An extensive, Chopin entry on the 1st beat of the bar is problematic to interpret. At first glance, it seems that the right-hand-side part of the entry is a letter 'p.' Depending on how we interpret the element that precedes the 'p,' we can receive either or , or – much more frequent for Chopin. The placement of a possible indication constitutes an equally difficult problem: the entry may be linked directly to the 3rd, 4th or 5th semiquaver of the bar. However, being aware of the Chopin inclination, revealing itself from time to time, to move indications to within the range of their validity, we also have to include a possibility that the indication shall refer to the beginning of the bar. According to us, it also cannot be excluded that the introduced signs are +8, which would refer to E at the beginning of the bar. Such an enhancement of the bass in the culminant point of the ascending sequence of thirds seems to be quite justified. It would be a different implementation of an idea written in A, in which the bass octave appears a bar earlier. On the other hand, eights marking a bottom octave are always written under the note, which significantly reduces the authenticity of this interpretation. Taking into account the above doubts, we do not include this entry in the main text; moreover, we place each of the possibilities in brackets. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
|||||||||||
b. 93-95
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
GE1 (→FE→EE) overlooked the indication Viol. in bars 93 and 95. The notation of A was restored in GE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 96-97
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
In the main text we reproduce the indications after A. In GE (→FE→EE) dashes between the dim. and smorzando indications were overlooked, whereas the latter was written in the form of an abbreviation. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »