Verbal indications
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »
b. 36
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
GE misreproduced the indication as radoscendo. The correct spelling appears in a proofreading of FE (→EE), perhaps as a result of Chopin's intervention. (The contemporary Italian orthography requires it to be spelled with a double "d": raddolcendo). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
b. 43
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
Chopin deleted the appassionato indication over the group of demisemiquavers in A, keeping it for the entrance of the theme in bar 45. category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Corrections in A |
|||||
b. 44
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
The missing dynamic sign for the orchestral part's reduction is most probably an oversight of the engraver of GE1 (→FE→EE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
|||||
b. 47
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE |
|||||
b. 53
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
The change of the dynamic indication arrangement performed in GE (→FE→EE) is most probably an arbitrary decision of the engraver. Cf. bar 63. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »