Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Verbal indications
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


Verbal indications

b. 36

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II

..

GE misreproduced the indication as radoscendo. The correct spelling appears in a proofreading of FE (→EE), perhaps as a result of Chopin's intervention. (The contemporary Italian orthography requires it to be spelled with a double "d": raddolcendo).  

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , Authentic corrections of FE

b. 43

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II

..

Chopin deleted the appassionato indication over the group of demisemiquavers in A, keeping it for the entrance of the theme in bar 45.  

category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information

issues: Corrections in A

b. 44

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II

in A & GE2

No marking in GE (→FEEE)

..

The missing dynamic sign for the orchestral part's reduction is most probably an oversight of the engraver of GE1 (→FEEE).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE

b. 47

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II

in A (→GE) & EE2 (→EE3)

No marking in FE (→EE1)

..

The absence of  in FE (→EE1) is most probably an oversight of the engraver.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE

b. 53

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II

forte in A

 in GE (→FEEE)

..

The change of the dynamic indication arrangement performed in GE (→FEEE) is most probably an arbitrary decision of the engraver. Cf. bar 63.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE