![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Errors in GE
b. 13
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
In view of the deletions in A one can understand that the engraver of GE (→FE→EE) omitted the category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Inaccuracies in A |
|||||||||||
b. 14
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
In the 2nd half of the bar GE1 initially included an erroneous slur, running from the b category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors resulting from corrections , Errors in GE , Authentic corrections of GE |
|||||||||||
b. 15
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
Omission of the slur in the editions could have been related to doubts concerning its reach: the slur reaches the half of the bar, but not the d
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccurate slurs in A , Errors in GE |
|||||||||||
b. 17
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 18
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
Omission of tenuto dashes over three octaves in GE1 (→FE→EE), despite having been consistently carried out both in this bar and analogous bar 86, does not seem to be Chopin's proofreading. According to us, it could have been a result of the engraver's misunderstanding of the combination of three articulation indications: a slur, tenuto marks and staccato dots. A slur actually designates also phrasing, while dots under a slur were generally used by Chopin to mark a lighter and shorter non legato. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |