Pitch
|
b. 65
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
The missing flats returning d If in bar 64 the version with harmonic accompaniment was chosen, the first or third version is to be selected here. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Omissions to cancel alteration , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||
|
b. 69
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
The missing flats before the penultimate demisemiquaver, in spite of their presence in all authentic sources, is almost certainly Chopin's mistake. Descending augmented seconds in scale passages do appear in his works (e.g. in bars 40 and 43), but not in a situation when the upper note of an augmented second would constitute a turning point of a figuration – cf. corresponding places in bars 28, 42 or 65. If in bar 64 the version with harmonic accompaniment was chosen, the first or third version is to be selected here. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Last key signature sign |
||||||
|
b. 70
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
In the main text we add cautionary naturals over the trills. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||
|
b. 72-74
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
In A there is no octave sign over the entire sequence of chords written with small notes. The patent mistake was corrected already in GE1 (→GE2,FE→EE), which could have been a result of Chopin's proofreading (however, the correction could have also been implemented by the reviser, since due to the overlapping of the hands, the mistake is evident). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of A , Authentic corrections of GE |
||||||
|
b. 75
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
In A Chopin wrote the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of GE |
(1) in 
returning d