|
b. 22
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
It does not seem that the slur of A should be interpreted in the way it was performed in the editions. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
|||||||||
|
b. 22
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In A one can see traces of corrections, probably transferring the part of the L.H. an octave lower (including the change of direction of the stems) from the syncopated crotchet to the end of the bar. category imprint: Corrections & alterations issues: Corrections in A |
|||||||||
|
b. 23-49
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In GE the entire first Tutti was printed – certainly erroneously – in a font of a normal size. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , FE revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 23-25
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The range of the slurs in the L.H. in A is unclear; in the main text we give the most likely interpretation. The slurring of GE1 (→FE→EE) is probably a combination of the initial inaccuracy of the engraver of GE1 and the later, perhaps authentic, proofreading of this edition. We suggest a proposal of conciliating this version with the notation of A as an alternative version. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccurate slurs in A , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of GE |
|||||||||
|
b. 23
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The first octave in the L.H. in A is a quaver, so that the bar includes only 7 quavers. The mistake was corrected in GE (→FE→EE), by replacing the quaver with a crotchet, which we consider an accurate interpretation of the notation of A: Chopin probably erroneously repeated the rhythmic value of the chord in the R.H., as it was in the four previous bars. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Rhythmic errors , Errors of A |
