mUltimate Chopin

Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 175

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

Wedge in A

No mark in GE1 (→FE→EE)

Dot in GE2
..

In the main text we give the wedge written in A. The versions of the editions are either erroneous – in GE1 (→FE→EE) the sign was overlooked – or inaccurate (the dot in GE2).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , Wedges

b. 175

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

..

In the main text we add a cautionary  before A. The  raising d to d, overlooked by Chopin in A, was added already in GE1 (→FE→EE, →GE2).

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Inaccuracies in A

b. 175-176

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

Slur to bar 176 in A & GE2

Slur in bar 175 in GE1 (→FE→EE)
..

Shortening the slur in GE1 (→FE→EE) is almost certainly a characteristic inaccuracy of the engraver of GE1. The slur of A was restored in GE2.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE

b. 175-180

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

Short accents in A (→GE→FE)

Vertical accents in EE
..

The change of the font of accents in EE is a characteristic manner of this edition.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions

b. 176-177

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

Slur to bar 177 in A (contextual interpretation→GE)

Slur in bar 176 in A (literal reading) & FE (→EE)
..

Although the slur in bar 176 is not continued in bar 177 (on a new page of A), the continuation is suggested so clearly that in GE it was led to the first quaver in bar 177. However, this undoubtedly correct version was not reproduced in FE (→EE), which is either a mistake of the engraver of FE or a proof of a correction of the slur in GE1 in the last phase of proofreading.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Inaccurate slurs in A