Issues : GE revisions
|
b. 247-248
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text we preserve the notation of the accents of A. It almost certainly marks – in spite of the use of single signs in five out of six places – accenting of respective notes in both hands. In GE1 (→FE) the signs were moved to such an extent that they clearly refer to the R.H. In EE and GE2 all accents were placed both in the part of the R.H. and the L.H., whereas in EE they were changed to vertical accents. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
|
b. 247-248
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
Shortening the slur in the editions is certainly a result of inaccuracy of the engraver of GE1. In turn, in the case of the addition of a slur for the L.H., Chopin's proofreading cannot be entirely excluded. In GE2 both slurs were preserved, extending both in accordance with the notation of the slur in the R.H. in A. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
|
b. 248
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||||||||
|
b. 248
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The wedge written in the part of the R.H. in A was reproduced in GE (→FE→EE) as a dot and another one was added in the L.H. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions , Wedges |
|||||||||||
|
b. 248
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
A later beginning of the slur in GE1 is an evident inaccuracy (the engraver made his work easier by avoiding an atypical slur). A slur compliant with the course of music was introduced both in FE (→EE) and GE2. The correction in FE could have been ordered by Chopin, but it remains uncertain. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
3 and a
