Issues : GE revisions

b. 261

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

Accent in A & GE2

No mark in GE1 (→FEEE)

..

The missing accent is certainly an oversight of the engraver of GE1 (→FEEE).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions

b. 263-264

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

..

In A the second halves of these bars are written in an abbreviated manner as minims with a quaver tremolo. In GE1 and subsequent editions, the quavers were written without abbreviations.

category imprint: Source & stylistic information

issues: GE revisions

b. 264

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

in A

in GE (→FEEE)

..

The change of  to  is, according to us, an arbitrary revision of GE (or perhaps a simple mistake).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions

b. 264

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

..

The top most note of the chord on the 4th quaver in GE1 (→FE1) is an erroneous b3. The mistake was corrected – most probably by Chopin – in the proofreading of FE2 (→EE). The correct version is also in GE2.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , Terzverschreibung error , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE

b. 265-266

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

Accents in A & GE2

No marks in GE1 (→FEEE)

..

There are neither traces of removal nor reasons to remove the accents in the proofreading of GE1, hence their absence is most probably an oversight. The signs were restored in GE2.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions