Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
b. 217-218
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
Subsequent shortenings of the sign in GE and FE (→EE) are certainly accidental. In the main text we reproduce the notation of A. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||||
b. 218
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE , EE inaccuracies |
||||||||
b. 219
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The c2 note is provided with a staccato dot in A; however, it was omitted in GE1 (→FE→EE), which is most probably an oversight. In turn, the accent under the note appearing in those editions could have been added by Chopin. However, according to us, in this case it is also a mistake of the engraver that is more likely, since accenting c2 diverts attention from the syncopation opening the next two-bar phrase. Therefore, in the main text we leave the notation of A (restored in GE2). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Authentic corrections of GE |
||||||||
b. 219
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
According to us, the additional dot in GE (→FE→EE) is most probably a mistake of the engraver of GE1. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||||
b. 219
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
Similarly as in bars 217-218, we consider the subsequent shortenings of the sign in GE (→FE) and EE to be accidental, hence in the main text we reproduce the notation of A. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , EE inaccuracies |