Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
|
b. 172
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The distinct wedge over the 1st chord written in A was overlooked in GE1. When proofreading FE (→EE), Chopin restored the staccato sign, yet this time in the form of a dot. The version, being the latest, should be adopted in the main text, if it were not for doubts whether the sign written by Chopin was reproduced correctly. Errors in interpretation of Chopin wedges would be very frequent in first editions – cf. e.g. the Etude in E category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE , Wedges |
|||||||||||
|
b. 172
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The missing one or two accents in the L.H. are certainly a result of mistakes of the engraver of GE1 (→FE→EE) and the reviser of GE2. The change of the type of accents in EE is a routine revision in this edition. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
|
b. 174
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The missing staccato dot over the F category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
|
b. 175
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text we give the wedge written in A. The versions of the editions are either erroneous – in GE1 (→FE→EE) the sign was overlooked – or inaccurate (the dot in GE2). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , Wedges |
|||||||||||
|
b. 175-180
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The change of the font of accents in EE is a characteristic manner of this edition. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
major, Op. 10 No. 11, bars 
quaver and long accent after 
are almost certainly oversights of the engraver of 
combination was not reproduced in accordance with the notation of 
