Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
b. 142
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The staccato dot over the 1st quaver in the L.H. was added in the proofreading of FE (→EE), most probably by Chopin. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
b. 143
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The missing accent in FE (→EE) is most probably an oversight. In GE2, the long accent, quite accurately reproduced in GE1, was changed to a much longer hairpin. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
||||||||
b. 144
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
Even if we consider the sign of A to be , the editions reproduced it inaccurately, extending it until the 4th quaver. However, the sign in A is almost certainly a long accent – cf. a sign of the same length on the last crotchet as well as a number of others, e.g. in bars 118-120, 125, 133. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||||
b. 145-146
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The overlooked staccato dots over G in bar 145 and A in bar 146 are certainly a mistake of GE1 (→FE→EE). GE2 added only the dot in bar 145. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 151-153
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The long accents at the beginning of the semiquaver passages in bars 151 and 153, overlooked in GE1 (→FE→EE), were restored in GE2 as short accents. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |