|
b. 72
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text, we add cautionary flats before a category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||
|
b. 73
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
In GC the part of the R.H. is written in this bar one octave lower, as the copyist forgot to end the octave sign in the new line of the text. All the remaining sources include the correct text. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Errors of GC |
||||||
|
b. 74-75
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
It is difficult to determine what led to the difference in slurring between GC (→GE) and FE (→EE). The notation of [A] could have been ambiguous, e.g. between the lines. In the main text we give the continuous slur of GC, since there is no visible musical reason to disrupt this rhythmically homogeneous, smoothly descending sequence. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Embracing slurs , EE inaccuracies |
||||||
|
b. 74-75
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text, we add flats before d category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||
|
b. 76
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
According to us, the first half of the bar has only one authentic version, written in [A] and conveyed by EE and FESch. The versions of GC and FE1, hence sources based on [A], were probably a result of its misinterpretation by the copyist and the engraver of FE. Chopin restored the correct text, by amending the mistake in FE2 and FESch and – most probably – in the base text to EE. The versions of FE3 and FE4 are most probably a result of mistakes at the time of proofreading FE2 and FE3 respectively. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Errors in FE , Authentic corrections of FE , Errors of GC |
2-a
