![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Errors of A
b. 108
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
The compatible versions of GC and FE1 (→FE2) prove that such a notation was also in [A]. Chopin's highly likely mistake, probably related to the introduction of an enhanced version of the transition to the next phrase (it may be supposed that bar 108 was originally a repetition of bar 107, same as in two previous similar phrases), is proved by awkward in this context parallel A category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: GE revisions , Errors of A , Authentic corrections of FE , Authentic corrections of GE , Authentic corrections of EE |
|||||
b. 130
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
On the 2nd crotchet GC and the previous impressions of FE include in the R.H. the clearly erroneous c category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions , Errors of A , Authentic corrections of FE , Errors of GC |
|||||
b. 168
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
In GC the bar is written in an abbreviated manner as repetition of the previous one. At the same time, one can see that initially the bar was completely overlooked, whereas a relevant abbreviation was written as an addition. It cannot be excluded that the mistake (or unclear notation) was also in [A]. If so, Chopin had to write a respective addition also there, as FE contains the correct number of bars. category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Errors of A , Abbreviated notation of A , Authentic corrections in GC |