b. 8
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
The version with a in FE1 is certainly not intended by Chopin, which is proved by the before the note in the respective bar of the recapitulation, which was not written in the base text to FE, as well as the compatible text of the remaining sources in the discussed bar. The engraver, instead of a , wrote an erroneous before this note (unjustified in this context). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , FE revisions |
||||||||
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
No accents in GC (→GE) is almost certainly an oversight of the copyist, who overlooked all signs between the staves in bars 7-13. The length of the 1st accent is confirmed by the notation of FE in bar 196, being a repetition of bar 8, and clearly longer signs in similar bar 28. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in FE , Errors of GC |
||||||||
b. 9-10
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
No in GC (→GE) is almost certainly an oversight of the copyist, who overlooked all signs between the staves in bars 7-13. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of GC |
||||||||
b. 10-11
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
In the main text we give a tie sustaining b2 on the basis of the most probably Chopin proofreading of FE4 in analogous bars 198-199. The situations, in which Chopin overlooks one of a few analogous places at the time of implementing corrections is not unusual – cf., e.g., the Etude in G major, Op. 10 No. 5, bar 4, Etude in B minor, Op. 25 No. 10, bar 87 or Waltz in A major, Op. 42, bar 81. An additional argument is the sustention of a2 in a musically and pianistically similar situation in bars 30-31. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Editorial revisions |
||||||||
b. 11-12
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
No accents in GC (→GE) is almost certainly an oversight of the copyist, who overlooked all signs between the staves in bars 7-13. The short accents in EE are certainly a result of the standard interpretation of the notation of FE. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE inaccuracies , Errors of GC |