mUltimate Chopin

Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 12-14

composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II

No arpeggio signs in GC (→GE)

Arpeggio sign in bar 13 in FE (→EE)

Arpeggio signs suggested by the editors
..

The arpeggio given in FE (→EE) could have been overlooked in GC (→GE) or added in [A] already after GC had been prepared. According to us, the sign has a nature of a general indication, valid in all analogous places (bars 32-34, 200-202, 220-222 and 255-256). 

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

b. 12

composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II

No tie in GC (→GE)

Tie to d1 in FE (→EE)
..

The missing tie sustaining d1 in GC (→GE) is almost certainly a result of an oversight of the engraver; similarly in bar 200. See also bar 13.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors of GC

b. 12

composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II

 in GC (→GE)

No sign in FE (→GE)
..

No  sign in FE (→EE) is certainly an oversight of the engraver – there is a respective sign in analogous bar 200, but both bars were printed on the basis of the one and only notation of [A].

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies

b. 12

composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II

No marking in GC (→GE)

in FE (→EE)
..

No  in GC (→GE) is almost certainly an oversight of the copyist, who overlooked all signs between the staves in bars 7-13.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors of GC

b. 13

composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II

Tie to d in GC (→GE) & FE2 (→EE,FE3→FE4)

No tie in FE1
..

The missing tie sustaining d in FE1 is undoubtedly a mistake of the engraver, corrected already in FE2. In the respective bar of the recapitulation (bar 201), FE1 includes this tie.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE , FE revisions