data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
GE1
compare
Chopin supplemented the ties sustaining g1 and c
2 when proofreading FE (→EE). The lack of ties could have been intentional—the
marking placed over the fourth g
1-c
2 suggests the repetition of those notes. The additional slur linking f
1 and e
1 in EE is certainly inauthentic .
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations
issues: Authentic corrections of FE
notation: Slurs