data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
b. 81-82
|
composition: Op. 25 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
Both lack of the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE inaccuracies |
||||||||
b. 81-83
|
composition: Op. 25 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
According to us, only the slurs of GE1 are certainly erroneous. The remaining two versions can be considered to be equal, whereas to the main text we adopt the slur of the base source (FC), confirmed in EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 81-83
|
composition: Op. 25 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
The pedalling of EE is probably authentic, which is proved by, i.a., the characteristic sustention of pedal at the transition between bars 82 and 83. It is only the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 83
|
composition: Op. 25 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
The missing bottom C1 in EE1 is most probably a mistake, corrected in EE2 (→EE3), perhaps on the basis of FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE , Abbreviated octaves' notation |