Issues : GE revisions
|
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 25 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
In the main text, we give the title and dedication after the title page of the entire Opus in FC and FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Dedications , GE revisions |
||||||||||||||||||
|
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 25 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
The use of category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Changes of metre , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , 4/4 or 2/2 |
||||||||||||||||||
|
b. 7-8
|
composition: Op. 25 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
It is unknown who interpreted Chopin's notation more accurately – Fontana in FC (→GE1) or the engravers of FE and EE. The version of GE2 (→GE3) is certainly non-authentic (and erroneous). The authenticity of the version of FC is additionally supported by the compatibility of the range of the hairpins in both analogous places (here and in bars 53-54). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||||||||||||
|
b. 13
|
composition: Op. 25 No 12, Etude in C minor
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||||||||||||
|
b. 14
|
composition: Op. 25 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
The cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals |
major, 
time signature surprises only in 
indication was not used in the Etudes – contrary to the manuscripts – at all, neither in Op. 25 nor in 
in 
before d is included in