|
b. 68-69
|
composition: Op. 25 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
GE1 does not include any accent in bar 68, whereas in EE1 (→EE2) there is no accent in the middle of bar 69 (similarly in bar 70). These patent errors were corrected in GE2 (→GE3) and EE3. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE , Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 69
|
composition: Op. 25 No 12, Etude in C minor category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 70
|
composition: Op. 25 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
We add an accent over the notes – see bars 13-14. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Errors in EE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 71-75
|
composition: Op. 25 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
In bars 71, 73, 75, in the main text we give long accents, placed over the bottom stave and probably written by Chopin in FC. It is not clear why this notation was not reproduced in GE – probably the notation of bars 17, 19, 23, 25, 27 and 77 was considered to be more accurate and it was generalised for all analogous bars. It cannot be excluded that the engravers of FE and EE followed this pattern, so in these editions the authenticity of the graphical shape of the accents is also uncertain. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE , Authentic corrections of FC |
||||||||
|
b. 72
|
composition: Op. 25 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
Same as in bars 16 and 24, the accents on the 11th and 15th semiquavers are remnants of the previous version. In the proofreading of FE Chopin changed them into long accents on the 9th and 13th semiquavers – see the previous note in this bar. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Authentic corrections of FE |
