Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
|
b. 72
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||||||||
|
b. 74
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
Lack of the sign in FE is probably chargeable to the engraver of this edition. In GC this bar is only briefly marked as repetition of bar 10 and it was probably the same in the remaining Stichvorlage manuscripts. Therefore, if FE has an accent in bar 10, it should be repeated also here (unless in bar 10 it was added only at the time of proofreading, which, according to us, is, however, less likely). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
|||||||||||||
|
b. 81
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
It is not entirely clear which type of accent Chopin had on his mind here. According to us, an inaccurate reproduction of the long accent in EE is, however, more likely than the reverse situation – the copyist's writing a long accent in place of the short sign in [A]. The sign in GC, very characteristic for Chopin's handwriting, could have been written with his hand. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE |
|||||||||||||
|
b. 84
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections in GC |
|||||||||||||
|
b. 87
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
In the main text we give an accent over d3 in the L.H., present in FE and EE and, in a variant form (in brackets), a long accent at the beginning of the bar, present only in EE. Cf. the note on staccato in the L.H. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions |
in 
