Lack of the sign in FE is probably chargeable to the engraver of this edition. In GC this bar is only briefly marked as repetition of bar 10 and it was probably the same in the remaining Stichvorlage manuscripts. Therefore, if FE has an accent in bar 10, it should be repeated also here (unless in bar 10 it was added only at the time of proofreading, which, according to us, is, however, less likely).
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: Errors in FE
notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins