|
b. 25
|
composition: Op. 25 No 6, Etude in G♯ minor
..
According to us, the earlier pedal release than in similar situations may be a result of Chopin's mistake, who, while introducing the pedalling, most probably in the already finished pitch and rhythm text, only saw the change of the chord and did not check its sound. Therefore, in the main text we suggest a variant solution. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 26
|
composition: Op. 25 No 6, Etude in G♯ minor
..
Chopin did not introduce any accidental before the 3rd chord (which results from the compatibility of the version of FC and FE). Hence it is to be interpreted as g category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 26
|
composition: Op. 25 No 6, Etude in G♯ minor
..
The flat added in EE2 (→EE3) is undoubtedly an arbitrary revision. This version distorts the characteristic motif of repeated notes, appearing in each of the analogous phrases at least six times. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 27
|
composition: Op. 25 No 6, Etude in G♯ minor
..
The patent error of GE1 could have been provoked by a slightly lower position of the head of this note in FC. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 27-28
|
composition: Op. 25 No 6, Etude in G♯ minor
..
Lack of slur is a patent error of GE1, corrected in GE2 (→GE3). In FE and EE the slur was placed under the notes, which was certainly an arbitrary decision of the engraver – in both editions the stems of the notes are directed upwards, while the slur was routinely moved to the side of note heads. category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: EE revisions , Placement of markings , Errors in GE , GE revisions , FE revisions |
in 
(without 
) in 
lowering g
1 at the beginning of the bar. In the same place, 
before the bottom note for 
