



Pitch
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »
b. 51
|
composition: Op. 25 No 5, Etude in E minor
..
FE has an erroneous g category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
|||||
b. 73
|
composition: Op. 25 No 5, Etude in E minor
..
The version without c category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Uncertain notes on ledger lines |
|||||
b. 73
|
composition: Op. 25 No 5, Etude in E minor
..
The version of EE2 (→EE3), in which the 1st triplet of the R.H. is written one octave higher than in the remaining sources is certainly an arbitrary revision. Its aim was certainly to avoid the leap between the 1st and 2nd triplet of the R.H., which can be considered to be pianistically justified, yet not as far as the sound is concerned. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||
b. 76
|
composition: Op. 25 No 5, Etude in E minor
..
On the 3rd beat of the bar in FC, one can see a correction – the b and b1 notes were added after a category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Errors of FC |
|||||
b. 86
|
composition: Op. 25 No 5, Etude in E minor
..
As the 9th semiquaver, FC (→GE1) features a g category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Errors of FC |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »