Issues : GE revisions
|
b. 35-36
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
..
The slur under the F notes at the transition between the bars, added by Chopin in the proofreading of FE (→GE1,EE), seems to indicate sustention of this note. Comparison with the notation of this motif two bars earlier indicates, however, that Chopin most probably thought about a phrasing slur, which the engraver arbitrarily moved to the side of note heads (it was a frequent, routine procedure ordering the notation; in the case of dyads or chords, it could, however, change the sense of the sign, same as in this case). In the subsequent GE the slur was moved higher, most probably as a result of comparison with analogous situation in bars 33-34. Similarly in bars 139-140. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Placement of markings , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||
|
b. 35
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
..
We add the staccato dot in the L.H. under the first note after analogy to the staccato in the R.H. A similar addition was performed in GE2 (→GE3→GE4). EE also did not include the dot in the R.H. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions , EE inaccuracies |
||||||
|
b. 35-36
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
..
GE2 (→GE3→GE4), analogously to bar 33, added staccato dots to two last L.H. quavers in bar 35, and the first in bar 36. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 35
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
..
All sources display an unfounded (cautionary?) category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 35-40
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
..
In bars 35 and 40 GE2 (→GE3→GE4) changed category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
next to g
3. 
to .png)
. See the