|
b. 7
|
composition: Op. 26 No 1, Polonaise in C♯ minor
..
GE4 (→GE5) arbitrarily added cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 7
|
composition: Op. 26 No 1, Polonaise in C♯ minor
..
In GE2 (→GE3→GE4→GE5) the beginning of the slur was arbitrarily moved over the 1st note of the bar, where the previous slur simultaneously ends. Similarly in bar 32. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 8-9
|
composition: Op. 26 No 1, Polonaise in C♯ minor
..
In the proofreading of FE1 Chopin removed the tie sustaining d category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
|
b. 9
|
composition: Op. 26 No 1, Polonaise in C♯ minor
..
The category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Errors resulting from corrections , Errors in GE |
|||||
|
b. 9
|
composition: Op. 26 No 1, Polonaise in C♯ minor
..
The slur over the triplet, written by Chopin in A, may be considered a phrasing element. FE (→GE1,EE) features this slur only in the repetition. In turn, in GE2 (→GE3→GE4→GE5) the revisers treated it as an indication of an irregular group - placing it in both places only over the digit and shortening it accordingly. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
for e in the L.H. (only the first time) and e2 in the R.H. (in both situations).
1 repeated in 
1 at the transition between bars 8 and 9.
indication, appearing in the repetition of bar 9 next to the G.png)
. The first indication could have been removed by Chopin in the proofreading of