b. 38
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
We add the staccato dot after analogous bar 34. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 39
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 39-40
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
The fingering added in EE comes from Fontana. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 39
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
In GE2 the accents were replaced with short marks, which were extended in GE3. All these and later changes (in subsequent GE,s) are a result of arbitrary interventions of the engravers or revisers. EE2 omits the accents, which is one of a numerous errors of this type present in this edition. The marks – in the form of short accents – were added in EE3 (→EE4). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
|||||||||||
b. 39-44
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
AI has in these bars only first two slurs in the R.H. in bar 44. The slurring of FE (→GE1→GE1a) is much more complete, yet also in these editions several slurs, which could be expected in the comparison of analogous fragments, are missing. In EE – and to a lesser extent – in the subsequent GE the slurs were gradually completed. According to us, all defects seem like an inaccuracy of notation, hence in the main text we suggest to generalise the slurs of FE in each analogous places, which was already applied in EE3 (→EE4). category imprint: Differences between sources |