b. 35-36
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
The accents, written in AI only in bar 35, most probably are to be considered as a model. It is confirmed by seven signs visible in FE (→GE,EE). The signs in FE (→EE), despite varied length and imprecise arrangement, are certainly long accents. In turn, it is not clear in GE, in which there is a visible tendency to extend the signs. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
||||||||||
b. 35-36
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
In both these bars, on the 12th, 13th and 16th semiquavers, AI has a c (in different octaves) and not a d. The correction from d2 to c2 on the 13th semiquaver in bar 35 indicates Chopin's hesitation, as eventually – in FE (→GE,EE) – all these notes were written as d. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Chopin's hesitations , Enharmonic corrections |
||||||||||
b. 35
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
Lack of the wedge in EE2 is certainly a mistake. The wedge in the L.H. is most probably a revision of GE and EE3 (→EE4). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE , GE revisions |
||||||||||
b. 37
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
In AI there is no cautionary before e1. The sign was most probably added in a proofreading of FE (→GE,EE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Cautionary accidentals , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||||
b. 37
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
We add a cautionary before d. category imprint: Editorial revisions |